🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.